Più di una superficie implantare unica. Massima prevedibilità.

La risposta biologica iniziale dopo l’inserimento dell’impianto è il primo passo per il successo di una terapia sostitutiva del dente.

Come vi assicurate di ottimizzare le capacità di guarigione del paziente per creare una migliore base ossea per i trattamenti implantari?

Le aspettative del paziente nei confronti della sostituzione del dente sono sempre più alte e i protocolli di cure personalizzate sono sempre più impegnativi.

Come ridurre la complessità dei protocolli di trattamento per soddisfare le aspettative e migliorare l’accettazione da parte dei pazienti?

I pazienti che presentano varie condizioni cliniche o con condizioni di salute compromesse sono sempre più difficili da trattare. Il problema nasce quando una malattia non è stata diagnosticata.

Come affrontare condizioni mediche pregresse dei pazienti e ottimizzare il trattamento per offrire loro opzioni in tutta sicurezza?

Bibliografia

1 Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, 76(2):323-334, 2006. 2 De Wild M. Superhydrophilic SLActive® implants. Straumann document 151.52, 2005 3 Katharina Maniura. Laboratory for Materials – Biology Interactions Empa, St. Gallen, Switzerland Protein and blood adsorption on Ti and TiZr implants as a model for osseointegration. EAO 22nd Annual Scientific Meeting, October 17 – 19 2013, Dublin 4 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at non-submerged and submerged chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 35.1 (2008): 64–75. 5 Rausch-fan X, Qu Z, Wieland M, Matejka M, Schedle A. Differentiation and cytokine synthesis of human alveolar osteoblasts compared to osteoblast-like cells (MG63) in response to titanium surfaces. Dental Materials 2008 Jan;24(1):102-10. Epub 2007 Apr 27. 6 Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA® titanium implants: Preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 11(4): 481-488, 2007. 7 Lang, N.P., et al., Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Implants.Res 22.4 (2011): 349–56. 8 Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2005 May–Jun;20(3):425–31. 9 Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, Nedir R, Jones A, Simpson J, Toutenburg H, Cochran DL. Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA® surface: a randomized pilot study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2007;22(5):755–760. 10 Benic GI, Gallucci GO, Mokti M, Hämmerle CH, Weber HP, Jung RE. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2013; [Epub ahead of print] 11 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 12 Lai HC, Zhuang LF, Zhang ZY, Wieland M, Liu X. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implant surfaces at sites with coronal circumferential defects: An experimental study in dogs. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2009;20(3):247–53. 13 Buser D, Wittneben J, Bornstein MM, Grütter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Stability of Contour Augmentation and Esthetic Outcomes of Implant-Supported Single Crowns in the Esthetic Zone: 3-Year Result of a Prospective Study With Early Implant Placement Post Extraction. J Periodontol. 2011 March; 82(3): 342-9. 14 Buser D, Chappuis V, Kuchler U, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Buser R, Cavusoglu Y, Belser UC. Long-term Stability of Early Implant Placement with Contour Augmentation. J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12 Suppl):176S-82S. 15 Nicolau P, Reis R, Guerra F, Rocha S, Tondela J, Brägger U. Immediate and early loading of Straumann® SLActive implants: A Five Year Follow-up. Presented at the 19th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Association of Osseointegration – 6-9 October 2010, Glasgow 16 International Diabetes Federation. http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/ 17 Schlegel KA, Prechtl C, Möst T, Seidl C, Lutz R, von Wilmowsky C. Osseointegration of SLActive® implants in diabetic pigs Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Feb;24 (2):128-34. 18 Reginster JY, Burlet N. Osteoporosis: a still increasing prevalence. Bone. 2006 Feb;38(2 Suppl 1):S4-9. 19 Mardas N, Schwarz F, Petrie A, Hakimi AR, Donos N. The effect of SLActive® surface in guided bone formation in osteoporotic-like conditions Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):406-15. 20 WHO: http://www.who.int/ageing/about/facts/en/index.html 21 *iData Report , Dental Implants and Final Abutments, Europe 2012 22 iData Report , Dental Implants and Final Abutments, USA 2012 23 Slotte Christer et al, Four-mm implants supporting fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible. 5-year results from a multicenter study. Presented at the 20th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Association of Osseointegration, 10-13 October 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark.